My passion is to help others in the community, young, old, and everyone in between, find relevance and joy in learning, performing or listening to classical music.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Musical Investigations - episode 2: Bernstein "A Big Indian and a Little Indian"

I really, really love this second episode of my "Musical Investigations" series not only because the music in question is absolutely hilarious, but also because I had a major lightbulb moment when I found the solution to my own problem.  The excerpt in question is from Leonard Bernstein's, "A Big Indian and a Little Indian" which is the fourth song in his adorable, clever song cycle, I Hate Music.  

There are several things about this song that initially freaked me out.
  • It's "con brio" which always makes me nervous because it usually means "fast."
  • It has multiple meter changes - 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 3/8, you-name-it/8.
  • There may as well not be any time signatures half the time because Bernstein seems to disregard them anyway in terms of phrasing and groupings of notes.
  • The right hand and left hand don't line up in terms of where the stresses are.  The left hand is stressed at the beginning of every three notes and the right hand is constantly changing making the whole passage a bit like patting your head and rubbing your tummy.
  • There are accents, especially in the voice part, and in meters like those listed above, accents can have a way of making the pianist feel like he/she is in the wrong place in the music.
On a positive note, the idea behind the song is hilarious.  It's a little kid telling a riddle, complete with several bars of vamping while the singer is waiting for the audience to solve the riddle.  I love it!

So how not to freak out?  How could I see this music in a simplified way so that my brain and hands didn't freeze up?

Take a look at this section...


This excerpt demonstrates one of my favorite methods of simplification because one hand, the left hand in this case, simply repeats the same pattern over and over again, leaving the eyes and brain free to concentrate on the other more difficult and complex line.  And at closer examination, that right hand part is only made up of a few different ingredients:
  • step-wise ascending and descending patterns that fall nicely in the hand
  • the opening motive (at the beginning of the second line)
  • a sequence starting at the beginning of the third line) involving an octave and ascending step-wise pattern that starts on D# then moves up to E, F#, G#, and finally to A. 
Not so bad when I looked at it that way.  

To put it all together I first worked on the right hand, using the patterns I had discovered to learn the part in a way that kept my mind engaged.  Then I looked at the left hand part and set up the vamped pattern, playing it over and over again until I felt like I was in a groove and didn't need to put any thought into it.  Once in that groove, I added the right hand in, trying not to see every individual note but instead seeing the patterns with a relaxed mind and relaxed hands.  After a few times under tempo, I got it.  I understood it.  It made complete sense and I realized that I didn't even have to pay attention to any of the meter changes.  

What was the best part of having figured this piece out?  I could actually listen to the riddle and laugh right along with the audience.  

I think Lenny would have approved!



6 comments:

  1. This piece looks like so much fun! Seriously! :)

    I love mixed meter because of the challenge. Plus the feeling I have after moving beyond the human metronome of 'dut-dut-dut' to feeling the pulse can't be beat (no pun intended).

    There is a huge difference between playing the notes and playing with comprehension. Your comprehension of patterns released your mind to actively comprehend and enjoy the text! That's another amazing feeling.

    I appreciate your willingness to take the mystery out of music and share your discoveries with others. Thanks for all you do :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello, Brandy! And thanks, as always for reading and commenting!

    Yes, this is a really fun piece to place as are all the songs in this cycle. Definitely check it out. And they aren't really that difficult to put together. I think you'd enjoy them.

    And I love your pun, by the way. Made me smile!

    Happy studying and practicing. Oh, and Happy Thanksgiving too :-)

    -Erica

    ReplyDelete
  3. Erica-
    A confession-
    I take one look and know for sure, absolutely, not a shadow of a doubt - "I'm not even gonna try this."
    Another reason why I admire your prowess, energy, verve and passion!
    Sign me "A fan and admirer of Erica Sipes"
    Wayne

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, Wayne. You are so kind. It's really nothing special that gets me to learn this stuff - sheer necessity. And I don't know why you think you'd never try something like this Bernstein clip. I know for a fact that you play even more challenging music. I have proof too! In fact, I'm gonna slip your CD in right now and listen to your glorious version or prowess, energy, verve and passion! :-)

    Many thanks as always for reading and for taking the time to pass on your words of encouragement!

    A member of your gigantic fan club,
    Erica

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love 8's and 16's... and Bernstein.

    My recent forage into composing has been with piece that aren't so mixed in their meter, but of in terms of even amounts (so, 7/8, 11/8, 15/16 and even 31/16). What underlies this is a sense of trying to create a regular pattern over this, something the performers can wrap their heads around, easily tap with their foot and yet, have a hesitation/anticipation that pushes or pulls the music into the irregularlity.

    Nice to see it from the other side...

    ReplyDelete
  6. No wonder I like your music, Chip. I happen to love those irregular meters although I have to say I don't know why that is. I kind of assumed it was just because I'm a bit odd and like to torture, whoops, I mean challenge myself with difficult rhythms but after reading your comment I'm thinking that those meters, combined with regular patterns that are laid over top creates an appealing tension.

    Hmmm...very interesting! And now I'm thinking about your piano concerto which, if I remember correctly, is full of such writing. Perhaps I'll go take a look at it again right now :-)

    Thank you for reading, Chip!

    Happy composing!

    Erica

    ReplyDelete